Does this make sense?
In my opinion, prospects of a future attack against the United States is almost certain,[Vice President Dick Cheney] said on NBC’s Meet the Press.We don’t know if it’s going to be tomorrow or next week or next year.He added that it wasnot a matter of if, but when….
A government official said [18 May 02] that the volume and pattern of suspected al Qaeda communications were similar to those of messages intercepted in the months before the September 11 terrorist attacks.
When compared to this?
Cheney rejected criticism that the Bush administration and federal agencies had reports foreshadowing the September 11 attacks but failed to act on them….
There were warnings over a period of months about the possibility of an attack at home,Cheney said, but it was impossible to warn the public effectively without specific information.
Doesn’t the new warning contradict the line that our government didn’t now something was up last time? We know that al Qaeda operatives are gearing up for something by the amount of traffic, similar to the boost before 11 Sep 01. Cheney said that it would have been useless to warn us about vague attacks last year, because
You can also sustain an alert for only so long. But that is exactly what these new warnings are, timeless alerts for vague attacks. Useless. And more likely than not, a very weak attempt by our government to deflect the attention from the failure of our intelligence and security agencies towards the fallacious idea that we’re on top of those damned Arabs, this time for sure.
The above quotes were taken from this CNN.com article.